1. Home /
  2. Criminal lawyer /
  3. Goldberg & Beyer

Category



General Information

Locality: Lancaster, Pennsylvania

Phone: +1 717-393-2500



Address: 40 E Grant St 17602 Lancaster, PA, US

Website: www.goldbergbeyer.com

Likes: 182

Reviews

Add review

Facebook Blog



Goldberg & Beyer 15.01.2021

We have extended many expiration dates in response to COVID-19. For additional details and a list of frequently asked questions, visit https://www.penndot.gov/p...ages/coronavirus.aspx. Questions related to driver and vehicle services can also be addressed by calling 717-412-5300. Driver and vehicle online services are available 24/7 at DMV.pa.gov for no additional fee. Services include: Driver's license, photo ID and vehicle registration renewals Driver-history services Changes of address And more

Goldberg & Beyer 29.10.2020

Goldberg & Beyer will continue to operate during the course of this pandemic. We will try to do more consultations by telephone and by video conferencing. We remain committed to protecting your rights and defending your interests. Please call if you have any questions or concerns. Stay healthy. G&B

Goldberg & Beyer 15.10.2020

"Laws that legalized recreational marijuana were associated with an 8% drop in the number of high schoolers who said they used marijuana in the last 30 days, an...d a 9% drop in the number who said they'd used at least 10 times in the last 30 days, according to the paper published in the medical journal JAMA Pediatrics on Monday." See more

Goldberg & Beyer 06.10.2020

Some unexpected guests this morning! Glad the Lancaster County Beekeepers Society could relocate them safely!

Goldberg & Beyer 24.09.2020

"Two years ago, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court shook up long-settled orthodoxy by ruling that the state’s sex offender registration law, otherwise known as SORN...A (Sexual Offender Registration and Notification Act) was punishment. The case, Commonwealth v. Muniz, 164 A.3d 1189 (Pa. 2018), presented the Court with two questions: whether people who committed their crimes before the adoption of the law could continue to be registered without running afoul of the state Constitution’s Ex Post Facto Clause, a fairness doctrine that prevents governments from retroactively applying greater punishments to conduct than could have been applied at the time of the crime; and, second, whether the law more broadly violates due process by unfairly labeling a person as sexually dangerous without first proving that fact and without giving the person an opportunity to challenge that message. While the Court answered the first question with a resounding yes, it punted on the second. The effect of that decision meant that although Pennsylvania was forced to reduce the length of registration for many people who had committed their crimes many years before, or in many cases remove them from the registry altogether, it did little to change how the law would be applied moving forward. SORNA was largely left undisturbed for the roughly 1500 new people added to the registry every year. The due process issue left undecided by the Pennsylvania high court in Muniz is now again before that court, and this time it will be harder to avoid deciding it." #SecondChanceMonth